<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Times New Viking - Rip It Off - mp3 review</title>
	<link>http://r8e8r.com/mp3review/2008/01/23/249</link>
	<description>We used to review mp3s, but we dont do that anymore.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 05:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://r8e8r.com/mp3review/2008/01/23/249#comment-342</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 18:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://r8e8r.com/mp3review/2008/01/23/249#comment-342</guid>
		<description>Which is why you LOVVVE 2 girls and a cup</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which is why you LOVVVE 2 girls and a cup</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://r8e8r.com/mp3review/2008/01/23/249#comment-341</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 18:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://r8e8r.com/mp3review/2008/01/23/249#comment-341</guid>
		<description>I just converted one of these mp3s from 192kbs to 16kbs and it sounds the same
 
original 1.5 mb
 
new track 129.3 kb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just converted one of these mp3s from 192kbs to 16kbs and it sounds the same</p>
<p>original 1.5 mb</p>
<p>new track 129.3 kb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://r8e8r.com/mp3review/2008/01/23/249#comment-340</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 18:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://r8e8r.com/mp3review/2008/01/23/249#comment-340</guid>
		<description>i think i like these guys!  but i'm a sucker for anything shitty</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think i like these guys!  but i&#8217;m a sucker for anything shitty</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor</title>
		<link>http://r8e8r.com/mp3review/2008/01/23/249#comment-339</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 18:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://r8e8r.com/mp3review/2008/01/23/249#comment-339</guid>
		<description>i almost said boombox in my review...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i almost said boombox in my review&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Athena</title>
		<link>http://r8e8r.com/mp3review/2008/01/23/249#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator>Athena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 18:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://r8e8r.com/mp3review/2008/01/23/249#comment-338</guid>
		<description>I don't like these tracks...sounds like a garage band recorded these from a boombox tape player.  Does anyone say boombox anymore (did they ever)?

Lani</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t like these tracks&#8230;sounds like a garage band recorded these from a boombox tape player.  Does anyone say boombox anymore (did they ever)?</p>
<p>Lani</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor</title>
		<link>http://r8e8r.com/mp3review/2008/01/23/249#comment-337</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://r8e8r.com/mp3review/2008/01/23/249#comment-337</guid>
		<description>definitely sounds like it was recorded this way on purpose, but why? i think the production quality sounds like absolute dogshit. i cant listen to this on a regular basis. although the songs themselves sound really decent. if these guys put out some tracks where the production was better, i'd be interested, but i'm not a huge fan of scraping the insides of my ears with nails, which is what this production quality reminds me of.
it sort of sucks that they did this, since i do like the songs. but now i won't listen to them because of their shitty production.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>definitely sounds like it was recorded this way on purpose, but why? i think the production quality sounds like absolute dogshit. i cant listen to this on a regular basis. although the songs themselves sound really decent. if these guys put out some tracks where the production was better, i&#8217;d be interested, but i&#8217;m not a huge fan of scraping the insides of my ears with nails, which is what this production quality reminds me of.<br />
it sort of sucks that they did this, since i do like the songs. but now i won&#8217;t listen to them because of their shitty production.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://r8e8r.com/mp3review/2008/01/23/249#comment-336</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://r8e8r.com/mp3review/2008/01/23/249#comment-336</guid>
		<description>EAR PAIN = the new ALT

There is something to the overproduced-ness of a lot of bands these days,
and this seems to be a reaction to that, but CMON DOODS......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EAR PAIN = the new ALT</p>
<p>There is something to the overproduced-ness of a lot of bands these days,<br />
and this seems to be a reaction to that, but CMON DOODS&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://r8e8r.com/mp3review/2008/01/23/249#comment-335</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://r8e8r.com/mp3review/2008/01/23/249#comment-335</guid>
		<description>A band that critics love (I mean, even Pitchfork likes them), but having
more than a cult following will be tough. Like the Pitchfork review says,
their songs aren't going to sell Volkswagons. I wonder though if they'll
sell even themselves except to those (kids) who like them distinctly for
their non commercial noisey-ness. I'd be curious to hear them clean as I
think they might sound alright - maybe 'cleaner' would be better. This
sounds less like home recording, lo-fi than purposeful dirty-ness and it
just sounds bad. In order to get through the tracks I have to turn my
headphones wayyyy down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A band that critics love (I mean, even Pitchfork likes them), but having<br />
more than a cult following will be tough. Like the Pitchfork review says,<br />
their songs aren&#8217;t going to sell Volkswagons. I wonder though if they&#8217;ll<br />
sell even themselves except to those (kids) who like them distinctly for<br />
their non commercial noisey-ness. I&#8217;d be curious to hear them clean as I<br />
think they might sound alright - maybe &#8216;cleaner&#8217; would be better. This<br />
sounds less like home recording, lo-fi than purposeful dirty-ness and it<br />
just sounds bad. In order to get through the tracks I have to turn my<br />
headphones wayyyy down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://r8e8r.com/mp3review/2008/01/23/249#comment-334</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://r8e8r.com/mp3review/2008/01/23/249#comment-334</guid>
		<description>exactly.  
 
lo-fi shouldn't mean ear-pain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>exactly.  </p>
<p>lo-fi shouldn&#8217;t mean ear-pain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://r8e8r.com/mp3review/2008/01/23/249#comment-333</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://r8e8r.com/mp3review/2008/01/23/249#comment-333</guid>
		<description>I like lo-fi poppy tracks like this, but these days it doesn't cost much to at least imrpove the quality to a point where you can at least enjoy the actual music without having to completely rejigger your stereo. stereo? who uses stereos anymore? ipods, mp3s, shitty computer speakers. blaaaaaaaa.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like lo-fi poppy tracks like this, but these days it doesn&#8217;t cost much to at least imrpove the quality to a point where you can at least enjoy the actual music without having to completely rejigger your stereo. stereo? who uses stereos anymore? ipods, mp3s, shitty computer speakers. blaaaaaaaa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.152 seconds -->

